Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Illinois), the chair of the Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy and a longstanding antagonist of tobacco harm reduction proponents, sent ominous letters to two companies that sell Synthetic Nicotine.

Krishnamoorthi asked Puff Bar, the disposable vape producer that has come under fire for alleged youth-centered marketing practices, and Next Generation Labs, the largest Synthetic Nicotine producer in the United States, to provide a bevy of information. From the former, Krishnamoorthi demanded, among other things, “all documents and communications referring or relating to the use of Synthetic Nicotine in Puff Bar products, including the decision to switch to Synthetic Nicotine, and all documents relating to the purchase of Synthetic Nicotine.” From the latter, he called for “documents sufficient to show all companies to which you supply Synthetic Nicotine capable of being used in e-cigarettes and/or e-liquids” as well as “documents sufficient to show that your Synthetic Nicotine products are not tobacco-derived.”

Last February, Puff Bar transitioned to Synthetic Nicotine. Meanwhile, Next Generation Labs, which produces “tobacco-free” nicotine under its trademark TFN, has seen sales apparently skyrocket since the FDA began denying regular-nicotine vaping products.

“We have [the letter] in hand and are reviewing and will respond accordingly,” Ronald Tully, a co-founder of Next Generation Labs, told Filter. “Next Generation Labs has always believed that Synthetic Nicotine should subject to a fair and appropriate regulatory structure and that a pathway needs to be created for the future oversight of products on the market today that contain TFN.”

He also noted that Puff Bar is “not a customer,” explained that Synthetic Nicotine “has the potential to significantly offset the carbon footprint created from the global production of tobacco and tobacco-extracted nicotine,” and welcomed “a well-conceived, appropriate and reasonable future FDA regulatory framework and pathway for products containing Synthetic Nicotine.”

“It is important to consider the role of Synthetic Nicotine in this broader context and not just as a narrow substitute to tobacco nicotine,” Tully continued.

It has long been assumed that it would take an order from Congress before the FDA took any definitive action against synthetic nicotine. Now, that might not be far off.

“You have apparently made the vile decision to continue enriching yourselves by poisoning children,” the letter to Puff Bar’s owners reads. “Puff Bar’s meteoric rise in popularity among kids resulted in $156 million in sales in 2020 alone. Puff Bar should not be allowed to continue harming children due to FDA’s failure to regulate Synthetic Nicotine, and I intend to put an end to your predatory practices.”

We specialize in manufacturing chemical Synthetic Nicotine ( CAS No.: 54-11-5 ) in China. we have the highest technology and stable quality control , our factory has sophisticated technology production route to produce the above products ,welcome to inquiry it .Please contact us by e-mail nicotine@haihengpharma.com for quotation requests. Please provide quantity, purity, and any other specific requirements.

Synthetic NicotineSynthetic Nicotine is used for Quitting Smoking
Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Illinois), the chair of the Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy and a longstanding antagonist of tobacco harm reduction proponents, sent ominous letters to two companies that sell Synthetic Nicotine. Krishnamoorthi asked Puff Bar, the disposable vape producer that has come under fire for alleged youth-centered marketing...